• Prompt/Deploy
  • Posts
  • From Prompt to Production: A Developer Workflow for Building with AI

From Prompt to Production: A Developer Workflow for Building with AI

Stop using AI for one-off tasks. Start using it to ship production code.

When I first started using AI, I was stuck thinking small.

A prompt here to name a function.
A suggestion there to refactor some code.
An autocomplete from Copilot.
Maybe a regex from ChatGPT.

Useful? Sometimes.
Repeatable? Rarely.
Strategic? Not at all.

This is what I call piecemeal AI: isolated, ad-hoc, disconnected tasks that feel helpful in the moment but don’t build toward anything bigger. It’s like asking a senior engineer for one-off help on ten different tickets — without ever learning how they think.

I know this pattern well. I lived in it for months.

I was testing every new tool. Saving cool prompts. Getting occasional velocity bumps. But I still didn’t know:

  • When should I use AI vs just write it myself?

  • How do I debug model failures systematically?

  • What does “good” prompting even look like in a real dev loop?

Eventually, I realized the real problem:

AI wasn’t integrated into my workflow — it was duct-taped to it.

And that’s why progress stalled. Not because I didn’t know how to prompt. But because I didn’t have a system.

The Breakthrough: Systematize the Stack, Not Just the Prompt

Everything changed when I stopped asking “What’s the right prompt?”
…and started asking:
“What’s the right system?”

That shift led to a simple but powerful insight:

You don’t scale by prompting harder. You scale by prompting smarter — inside a repeatable workflow.

I stopped chasing one-off AI tricks and started designing an AI-native stack around how I actually build:

  • I created prompt templates tied to specific dev tasks

  • I logged what worked, what failed, and why

  • I added guardrails and evals to catch bad generations early

  • I used AI to scaffold features, write tests, and prep docs — all in one loop

The results weren’t just faster. They were clearer, more repeatable, and easier to improve over time.

Instead of treating AI as a shortcut, I started treating it like infrastructure.

And that shift unlocked something bigger:
a consistent, scalable Prompt-to-Production pipeline — one that uses AI at every stage of development, without breaking trust or flow.

The Framework: 6 Stages from Prompt to Production

In the early days, I used AI like duct tape — patching one task at a time.

But real leverage comes from treating AI like a workflow engine.

That’s where the Prompt-to-Production framework comes in — a 6-stage developer loop designed to turn vague ideas into shipped features, using AI at every step.

💡 Not sure where you are in your AI-native journey?

Take the AI-Native Developer Scorecard — a 2-minute quiz that shows your current level, common pitfalls, and what to focus on next.

Here’s the high-level map:

Stage

What You’re Doing

Why It Matters

1. Frame the Feature

Clarify what you're building and why

Prevents vague prompts, feature bloat, and misaligned outputs

2. Forge the Foundation

Scaffold the component or logic

Get working code faster — with the right structure from the start

3. Fortify with Tests

Add test coverage using AI-generated cases

Build trust and catch failures early

4. Fine-Tune the Flow

Refactor, debug, and improve edge cases

Turn draft code into reliable, maintainable features

5. Finalize + Ship

Write PR summaries, update docs, deploy

Speed up approvals and knowledge sharing

6. Feedback & Learn

Log what worked, track failures, iterate

Close the loop — and level up your prompts and systems over time

Each stage maps to a real dev task.
Each one can be AI-assisted, AI-augmented, or fully AI-native.

It’s about designing a workflow where AI is embedded intelligently, not bolted on.

Coming up next:
We’ll break down each stage — with examples, prompts, and pitfalls to avoid.

Stage 1: Frame the Feature

Most devs skip this step.
They drop vague specs into GPT and hope for the best.

The result?
Bloated outputs. Confused flows. Code that technically works — but doesn’t solve the real problem.

Framing the feature means taking a breath and asking:

  • What am I actually building?

  • Who’s it for?

  • What edge cases matter?

  • What does success look like?

This step creates a tight prompt boundary — so you can ship smarter, not sloppier.

Prompts That Help

Instead of:

“Build a login form with 2FA”

Try:

“You’re a senior frontend engineer. I’m building a login form with email + password, plus optional 2FA via TOTP. UX must be mobile-first, and errors should be accessible. What questions would you ask before building?”

This creates:

  • Clarifying questions

  • Design constraints

  • Implementation guardrails

It also gives you reusable scaffolding for future features — prompt fragments like:

“Assume mobile-first UX, accessibility best practices, and security compliance”

AI-Native Tips

  • Systematize your prompts: Build a feature briefing template.

  • Loop in stakeholders: Use AI to simulate PM or designer feedback before you code.

  • Use diagrams: Tools like Mermaid + AI can co-generate flowcharts from specs.

Common Mistakes

  • Starting with “Write a component for X” before defining what X actually is

  • Leaving key behaviors, edge cases, or constraints undefined

  • Not reusing successful prompt scaffolds for similar tasks

Stage 2: Forge the Foundation

“Start with scaffolding. Not syntax.”

Once your feature is framed, avoid jumping straight into code generation.
Forge the foundation first — layouts, logic flows, component trees, file structure.

Why?
Because large language models are great at shaping patterns — but only when you give them a structure to fill.

This is where AI shifts from intern to architect.

This is not the stage for implementation details, UI polish, or deep logic.
It’s the phase where you turn a vague feature into a clearly structured blueprint.

Prompts That Help

Instead of:

“Write the component for X”

Try:

“Outline the component structure, prop flows, and file organization for this feature: [insert framed spec]”

“Draft a React component tree and folder layout for a multi-step login flow with optional 2FA.”

These prompts force the model to:

  • Think in systems

  • Avoid premature detail

  • Produce something composable

You’re not asking for final code — you’re building the skeleton.

AI-Native Tips

  • Use Markdown + AI: Let the model output a full structure you can paste and fill.

  • Pair with visual tools: Copilot Workspace or Cursor’s tree view helps visualize what you’re building.

  • Version your scaffolds: Save “v1 scaffolds” so you can trace prompt drift or debug upstream issues later.

Common Mistakes

  • Asking for fully coded features before outlining their architecture

  • Mixing too many concerns (logic, styles, UX) into one prompt

  • Ignoring modularity — which limits reuse across features

Stage 3: Fortify with Tests

“If it’s worth building, it’s worth testing.”

Before you generate the implementation, generate the tests.

It feels backwards — but it’s one of the most underrated AI-native upgrades.

Why?
Because AI thrives on clear specs and examples. And tests are the clearest spec you can give.

Instead of writing tests after code, use AI to define expected behaviors first, which then shape better implementation.

Prompts That Help

Instead of:

“Write a login feature for X”

Try:

“Write Jest tests for a login feature that supports email + password, optional 2FA, and form validation edge cases.”

You can then feed the generated tests back to the model to write compliant code.

This tightens the loop:

  • Frame the spec

  • Generate tests

  • Generate code that passes them

And because LLMs are better at reasoning from examples, the tests often improve the final code’s quality.

AI-Native Tips

  • Prompt with edge cases: AI tends to miss subtle failure modes unless told.

  • Log tests like you log code: They become reusable patterns for future features.

  • Automate evals: Use tools like Promptfoo to auto-run your generated tests across prompt variants.

Common Mistakes

  • Writing tests after generation — reinforcing bugs instead of preventing them

  • Leaving test generation entirely manual

  • Using vague test prompts that don’t capture business logic

Stage 4: Fine-Tune the Flow

“Now you write code. But with a feedback loop.”

You can think of scaffolding (Stage 2) as the skeleton, and test writing (Stage 3) as the guardrails. The actual code that fills it all in? That’s Stage 4.

Once your structure and tests are in place, it’s time to generate working code.
But don’t treat it as a one-shot task — treat it as a conversation.

This is where most AI-assisted devs get stuck:
They prompt for an implementation, get flawed output, and give up or manually patch it.

AI-native devs?
They guide the model through a feedback loop.

You’re not just accepting what it gives — you’re shaping it, step by step.

Prompts That Help

Instead of:

“Write the full implementation for this login form”

Try:

“Write the implementation for this login form — conforming to these tests: [insert test cases]”

“Refactor this code to improve clarity and pass all tests. Original code: [insert snippet]”

You’re teaching the model the target outcome — and letting it revise toward it.

AI-Native Tips

  • Paste in tests or expected outputs: Context helps the model self-correct.

  • Log failed attempts: They often reveal reusable fixes or bad patterns.

  • Iterate intentionally: Instead of regenerating the whole file, patch specific logic chunks.

Think of this as pair programming — but you’re the lead, and the AI’s here to iterate fast.

Common Mistakes

  • Treating generation like a vending machine (prompt → code → done)

  • Skipping test-driven iteration

  • Not saving intermediate versions (you’ll lose your best ideas)

Stage 5: Finalize + Ship

“Code isn’t done when it works. It’s done when it’s shareable.”

Once the implementation passes tests, your job isn’t over.
You need to prepare it for handoff, review, or deployment — and AI can help here too.

This stage is about wrapping the work:
Docs, PR descriptions, commit messages, changelogs, release notes — anything that explains why it matters and how it works.

When you prompt for finalization, you're cleaning up code while increasing team velocity.

Prompts That Help

Instead of:

“Write docs for this file”

Try:

“Generate a PR description that explains the feature, its edge cases, and how it was tested.”

“Summarize this change for teammates unfamiliar with the component. Use bullet points.”

“Write a changelog entry: [insert diff or commit message]”

This helps the AI shift into explainer mode — and you move from builder to communicator.

AI-Native Tips

  • Prompt for multiple artifacts: One code change can generate a PR body, inline comments, and docs in one go.

  • Refine tone: Prompt again if the style isn’t teammate-friendly. Use your past PRs as examples.

  • Save doc prompts: You’ll reuse them more than you think — especially if you commit regularly.

Common Mistakes

  • Rushing to merge without summarizing the intent

  • Writing documentation manually when AI could draft it 10x faster

  • Forgetting to explain context — which slows down onboarding and reviews

Stage 6: Feedback & Learn

“Every prompt is a prototype. Every output is a lesson.”

Most devs stop at shipping. AI-native devs loop what they learn back into their system.

This last stage is about closing the feedback loop:
What worked? What failed? What patterns emerged? How should your future prompts evolve?

When you log, audit, and refine your AI workflows, you stop being just a user — and become an AI-native engineer.

Prompts That Help

Instead of:

“That worked. Moving on.”

Try:

“What parts of this prompt helped the model succeed?”

“Where did the model miss — and why?”

“What would I change next time?”

You can even ask the model to self-audit:

“Evaluate this prompt’s clarity and suggest 3 improvements.”

AI-Native Tips

  • Use a Prompt Log: Track which prompts worked and why. (We’ve included a free template.)

  • Capture failure modes: Note when models hallucinate, skip steps, or miss edge cases.

  • Test prompt variants: Tools like Promptfoo help you compare prompt versions with real evals.

Common Mistakes

  • Skipping prompt reviews — and repeating the same bugs

  • Never iterating on “good enough” prompts

  • Forgetting that better prompts = better outcomes = faster shipping

That’s it — the full Prompt-to-Production loop.

❌ Before: Disconnected, Low-Leverage

  1. Prompt GPT to scaffold a component.

  2. Copy it into your IDE.

  3. Hit an error → try a different prompt.

  4. Tweak the code manually.

  5. Repeat for tests, docs, and PR messages — from scratch every time.

It’s reactive, inefficient, and hard to scale. Every task is a one-off. There’s no feedback loop. No patterns. No evolution.

✅ After: Integrated, High-ROI

Using the Prompt-to-Production framework:

  1. Frame the feature clearly — you and the model start on the same page.

  2. Forge reusable scaffolds: folder layout, prop flows, component trees.

  3. Fortify with tests before implementation — specs drive code.

  4. Fine-Tune the feature with structured prompts (e.g., generate edge case handling).

  5. Finalize + Ship with consistent PR messages, commit summaries, and docs.

  6. Feedback & Learn — log what worked, version prompts, and track success.

Every step reinforces the next. Prompts become assets. Output becomes input. You’re engineering with AI.

Prompt Patterns for Each Stage

“Tools change. Prompt patterns scale.”

Across the six stages, different styles of prompting work best.

This section shows you how to structure your prompts — whether you’re using GPT-4, Claude, Cursor, or anything else.

Stage-by-Stage Prompt Patterns

Stage

Best Prompt Pattern

Why It Works

1. Frame the Feature

Role-based prompts (e.g., “You are a senior engineer…”)

Focuses the model’s perspective and output format

2. Forge the Foundation

Structural scaffolds (e.g., “Outline the folder structure…”)

Encourages modular, composable outputs

3. Fortify with Tests

Specification-based prompts (e.g., “Write tests for X behavior…”)

Translates business logic into concrete, checkable outputs

4. Fine-Tune the Flow

Refinement loops (e.g., “Improve this to handle [edge case]…”)

Boosts precision, handles exceptions, improves UX

5. Finalize + Ship

Multi-output prompts (e.g., “Write PR message + changelog…”)

Consolidates delivery artifacts for smooth handoff

6. Feedback & Learn

Reflective prompts (e.g., “What could go wrong with this code?”)

Generates lessons, identifies weak spots, logs learnings

When to Reuse, Adapt, or Retire

  • Reuse prompts that produce clean, modular outputs — these become templates.

  • Adapt prompts as your features evolve — reuse the pattern, not the wording.

  • Retire prompts when they start producing stale or hallucinated results — especially after model upgrades.

Prompt-to-Production FAQ’s

Not every dev is building end-to-end features solo. Not everyone is using ChatGPT. Some aren’t ready for agents yet. That’s the point of this framework — it scales to your stack, team role, and tool of choice.

Here’s how it holds up under real-world conditions:

“I don’t build big features solo.”

Even if you’re just writing unit tests, reviewing PRs, or building small components — you can apply the relevant stages to your slice of the work.

In fact, having a shared mental model like this improves handoffs, makes your prompts more reusable, and creates smoother team interoperability.

“I just need help with X — not a whole system.”

That’s fine.

You don’t have to use all 6 stages from day one. Start with the pain point.

  • Need better tests? Focus on Stage 3.

  • Struggling with boilerplate? Try Stages 2 and 4.

  • Writing docs no one reads? Stage 6 helps turn them into real-time feedback loops.

The stages are modular. Use what’s useful.

“Does this even work without agents?”

You don’t need agents to be AI-native. This framework works whether you’re using Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor — with or without agents.

Agents aren’t a separate path. They’re just a way to delegate parts of this workflow once you’ve built repeatable loops.

“I don’t use ChatGPT — does this still apply?”

Yes.

The point isn’t which tool you use — it’s how you use it. This framework is tool-agnostic by design.

If your prompts are structured, versioned, and logged, they’ll work across GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, or whatever model comes next.

Prompt portability is real. And when you treat your prompts as reusable assets, it’s easier to adapt across tools.

Your Next Steps: Start with One Loop

You don’t need to overhaul your whole dev process tomorrow.

The easiest way to go AI-native?

Run a single feature through all six stages.

  • Frame it clearly

  • Scaffold the structure

  • Write the tests first

  • Generate the code

  • Ship with confidence

  • Capture learnings

That’s one loop.

Do this once, and you’ll feel the shift: less context-switching, more clarity, better output.

Repeat it a few times, and you’ve built a system.

Start Your Prompt Log

Don’t just prompt and forget.

Create a log where you:

  • Save high-performing prompts

  • Track test results

  • Spot reusable patterns

  • Tag by task, tool, and failure mode

You’ll build a personal library of assets that compounds over time.

Use my free Prompt Log Template to get started — or create your own system in Notion, Obsidian, or Markdown.

Not Everything Has to Be AI-Generated

AI-native doesn’t mean AI-only.

It means building workflows where:

  • Prompts are versioned like code

  • Feedback loops are baked in

  • Your tools learn from your own dev habits

Start small. Improve fast.

Want the Full Checklist?

This post walked you through the Prompt-to-Production Framework.

But if you’re the kind of dev who wants zero-fluff, actionable tools to integrate this into your real workflow…

Grab the free Prompt-to-Production PR Checklist:

  • Covers all 6 stages of the Prompt-to-Production loop

  • Designed for real teams shipping real code — not toy demos

  • Works across frontend, backend, and integration workflows

  • Includes prompt examples, QA checks, edge case reminders, and full-stack considerations

  • Helps you structure better PRs, write clearer specs, and level up your test game

Built by a dev (me) using this system in production — and improving it with every cycle.

Or subscribe to get future frameworks delivered straight to your inbox:
👉 Prompt/Deploy Newsletter

Reply

or to participate.